Requirements Clauses and Changes in Issue 4 of BRC Packaging Standard

The format of the Requirements has been updated to be consistent with other BRC Global Standards and therefore does not include Best Practice Guidelines. The Requirements have been reviewed and expanded and several new sections have been incorporated in light of industry requirements. The number of clauses now total a maximum of 242 (from 178) and include more detailed guidance and clarity to facilitate interpretation for certification bodies and companies. Particular reference is made to the following:

* Management Commitment and Continual (clause 1)

Management Commitment and Continual Improvement has been extensively revised to ensure that a high priority is placed on clear evidence of senior management commitment in the provision of resources and communication. Continual improvement shall be effected through comprehensive management reviews. Additional requirements specific to the audit process include having the current issue of the Standard and ensuring effective corrective action for non-conformities is undertaken.

* Hazard and Risk Management (clause 2)

Hazard and risk management has been comprehensively reviewed and contains guidance to companies to ensure a thorough hazard and risk analysis is undertaken. Now split into 3 subsections it contains requirements for a trained multidisciplinary team and annual review.

* Customer Focus and Contract Review (clause 3.3)

Customer Focus and Contract Review is now included which specifies the requirement to identify and review customer requirements and those individuals who communicate with customers.

* Site Security (clause 4.2)

In response to current issues, Site Security has been pulled together as a stand alone section, requiring controlled access and training of staff and secure storage of materials.

* Product Design and Development (clause 5.1)

A new section of Product Design and Development has been incorporated which requires customer design requirements to be defined and agreed and used to develop procedures and specifications.

* In-line Testing Equipment (clause 5.2)

The control of In-line Testing Equipment is now covered, where the need shall be based on hazard and risk analysis and controlled by documented procedures. The BRC will be working more closely with certification bodies and accreditation bodies to improve the infrastructure through training and the development of performance monitors.

From the above mention clause following are the Fundamental requirement of this standard (Any major NCR in below clauses lead to non certificate)

Clause No.

1.2 – Senior Management commitment

2.2 – Hazard and Risk analysis

3.3 – Internal Audits

3.7 – Specifications

3.9 – Traceability

4.9 – Housekeeping and Cleaning

5.3 – Process Control

6.1 – Training and Competence

To allow time for retailers, producers and certification bodies to become fully familiar with the new requirements and for the BRC to develop their support and infrastructure the BRC had recognize certification against the revised Standard for Issue 4 from August 2011. the user of this kit are suggested to purchase the BRC standard from BRC site and now it is BRC standard requirement to have original copy of BRC standard in the companies going for BRC. Read all the requirements of BRC from the standard and it is self explanatory and discussed by point wise in the slides. For your ready reference we are giving key requirements of BRC standard as below.

* KEY BRC requirements to take care

1. Quantity Measurement

Quantity Measurement looks at both food and non-food products that are subject to the weights and measures regulations. The Guideline reviews the documentation evidence needed to record the manufacturing process of a product.

2.Metal Detection

Metal Detection ensures all necessary steps are taken to identify, avoid, eliminate or minimise the risks of metal or other foreign body contamination by covering how a metal detector works, what type of metal detector to install, positioning, calibration, production line checks and frequency, rejected products and maintenance.

3. Internal Audit

Systems and procedures which are critical to product safety, legality and quality need to be audited to ensure they are in place, appropriate and complied with. The guidelines cover determining the frequency of checks, auditor training, auditor reports and corrective action.

4. Pest Control

A pest control contractor or appropriately trained personnel should regularly inspect and treat premises to deter and eradicate infestation. This guideline covers the level of pest control needed, necessary inclusions for a contract with an external contractor, installation, routine monitoring, bait takes, determining frequency of checks and the field biologist’s role.

5. Process Validation – Low Acid Canning

This Guideline explain process validation point by point for low acid canning, it also covers product areas that require validation and how to conduct process validation with the aim to produce safe and legal products.

6. Complaint Handling

Sources of complaints that impact on both the retailer and the supply chain are examined. The Guideline looks at the systems needed to handle them, how to respond to the customer, investigations of complaints and includes all necessary complaints documentation.

7. Shelf-Life Determination

Proper shelf-life determination analysis is critical to ensure the longevity of the product. This Guideline reviews all the necessary procedures and documentation that both the retailer and supply chain will need.

8. Product Recall

Product recall and withdrawal procedures should be regularly tested to ensure effective operation. This Guideline provides information on product recall simulation,

9.Traceability Testing

Systems need to be regularly tested to make sure tractability can be determined from raw material to finished product and vice versa. This publication looks at the benefits of Tractability Testing, determining the frequency of checks and dealing with non-conformances.

What Matters and What Doesnt in the Fight to Find the Best New York Bookkeepers

What matters in finding the best New York bookkeepers can be hard to determine, largely because every business is different and each person is going to be looking for different aspects that make them comfortable. Still, one aspect that all industry analysts can all agree is that finding bookkeepers that have relevant experience is important. What is relevant experience? If the business is a start-up, it’s very important to find a firm that specializes in the unique needs that neophyte businesses have. If they have that kind of experience and they have experience in a given industry, this is doubly good news and that can be enough to find a pool to select from. But this isn’t the only thing because when dealing with startups, it’s critical that there’s mutual respect and good understanding because there’s likely to be involvement and potentially a mentoring relationship that will exist between the two parties.

The problem is that too many bookkeepers that are qualified to help start-ups end up only focusing on large corporations because they tend to be more lucrative. Start-ups won’t get the time and advice they need and the firm won’t see the account as profitable enough and it becomes a low priority and that benefits no one. Those accountants have good knowledge, but they may not have the time or customer service focus to properly work with someone just creating a start up.

In these situations, a person setting up their first business will have many more issues and require more guidance than a more experienced customer who only needs an accountant to balance books and file paperwork. But a qualified company that takes the time to work and grow with the start-up can be rewarded when that company succeeds and becomes much larger.

Aside from these abstract issues, there’s a cold hard fact that all New York businesses and New York bookkeepers need to be aware of: These start-ups tend to have a lot of tax issues early on from both state and local. For a new business who has spent the past year working 16 hour days and 7 day weeks, the prospect of an audit is enough to cause a mental breakdown and this is where a good New York bookkeeper can avoid these problems and allow the entrepreneur to really focus on their major concerns. But the problem is that many accountants have differing specialties and picking one that may not have enough start-up experience or enough within a vertical and that is a recipe for disaster, be it early on or down the road.

Even among these experienced accountants, separating the ones that will save money from those that will end up costing a lot of money because of mistakes, is not easy. It can be extremely difficult to find the right experience and the right bedside manner. Not only does a prospective client need to ask the New York bookkeeper a lot of questions, but they need to ask themselves a lot of questions and rely on how much experience they have and how much help they think they’ll need.

The importance of fees in determining the best bookkeeper to choose

One of the biggest traps that small businesses face is how to balance the resume of their prospective bookkeepers and the cost. Major firms are very expensive, but provide a peace of mind that a smaller low-cost option may not provide. On the other hand, a more inexpensive option can free up capital to be invested in the business. It’s very easy to get a false sense of security from bookkeepers that have low fees compared to the industry, but they may not be a good fit and they may end up costing more in the end.

The most important feature in determining what makes for a good fit is how relevant and how much experience that bookkeepers nyc have. An inexpensive option may often be new to the industry and doing anything to build a client base. While that has its benefits, it can also be problematic because saving a small amount of money is not worth a tax audit, both financially and in the stress that it would cause and how that would negatively impact the business. A bookkeeper must be evaluated like anything else and everything must be viewed through an objective lens. One or two factors cannot be enough to start a relationship with bookkeepers or anyone else that will be interacted with on a daily basis.

Individuals starting a small business have a plan and tend to put all of their focus and energy into that. That kind of drive is what makes these businesses succeed, but overlooking seemingly small issues like bookkeepers can be disastrous. The point is that most individuals want to focus on their business and not on mundane issues such as taxes and financial prep. Too many people assume that bookkeepers are interchangeable. The same business would never feel that way about their suppliers or other close partners, but they feel bookkeepers are like cleaning ladies and that attitude can lead to major problems.

The biggest safeguard comes from finding a good reference from a bookkeeper nyc and their clients. That reference that comes from a company that does the same kind of work can be critical, even if it is a competitor. That said, even similar companies have different needs, let alone those in different verticals. Therefore, what works for the huge and very experienced company is unlikely to work for that brand new company. Bookkeepers can serve as a partner and provide a very valuable service to their clients, but as stated above, no two clients are the same and they can’t be directly compared.

How important are bookkeepers to the success or failure of a new business? A new business is unlikely to survive a tax audit their first year and bookkeepers that are properly vetted can avoid this. That can be the difference between success and failure. Even further, having competent representation can truly be the difference between a business that can keep its head above water and one that thrives. For that reason, having a good bookkeeper that has experience working with similar businesses is a necessity because there a lot of unique issues faced by new businesses that existing companies don’t always have to deal with.